| 9,078 | 35 | 278 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
忙已经成为时代的一个显著特征。受身兼数职、多重张力和被动互赖等结构性工作特征的影响，教师之忙相当可观。但教师之忙形态各异，却又最终都变成一种循环。本文通过扎根理论的研究，发现受社会期待的影响，教师们对“正常之忙”的界定决定了“忙”是走向稳态循环还是恶性循环。与西方的向外归因相比，教师们对“忙”的影响因素的向内归因和“求解”策略的向内使力，使得忙之循环更具有一种宿命论色彩。理论解释上，我们将循环因果论的视角引入忙之研究，以同时纳入系统分析和行动分析。从行动科学的视角，本文提出了调整心智、识别界限和改善互动的超越忙之循环的行动思路。
Abstract：Busyness has been a sign of the times. Teachers' busyness is a significant phenomenon that is influenced by multiple duties, various tensions and passive interdependence of work structural features. Although there are different types of teachers' busyness, eventually they go into cycles. Using grounded theory approach, this study found that teachers' definition of “acceptable busyness”, is a key determinant of whether busyness becomes stable or vicious cycle. In contrast to extroverted attribution in western society, teachers' inward attribution of the influencing factors of “busyness” and the inward force of solving strategies make the busyness cycle more fatalistic. Theoretically, we introduce the circular causality concept into busyness research to incorporate both system analysis and action analysis. From the perspective of action science, our study proposes action suggestions that go beyond the busyness cycle including adjusting mental model, identifying boundaries, and improving interaction.
[1] OECD.TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I):Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners [EB/OL].https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en,2019-06-19/2022-01-01.
[2] 李新翠.中小学教师工作量的超负荷与有效调适[J].中国教育学刊，2016(2):56-60.
[3] 刘乔卉，裴淼.中小学教师的时间困境——基于T市中学教师的混合研究[J].教育学术月刊，2021(6):76-82.
[4][10] 李新翠.中小学教师工作负荷：结构、水平与类型[J].湖南师范大学教育科学报，2021,20(2):82-89.
[5][13][26][43][45] Holdsworth,C.The Social Life of Busyness [M].Bingley:Emerald Publishing Limited,2021.
[6][22][30] Gershuny,J.Busyness as the Badge of Honour for the New Superordinate Working Class [J].Social Research,2005(2):287-314.
[7][31] Bellezza,S.,Paharia,N.,& Keinan,A.Conspicuous Consumption of Time:When Busyness and Lack of Leisure Time Become a Status Symbol[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2017(1):118-138.
[8][15][24][32] 王富伟，胡媛媛，赵树贤.小学教师典型一天的制度分析[J].全球教育展望，2018(9):117-128.
[9] 李新翠.劳动过程理论视角下的中小学教师减负审视[J].教育与教学研究，2021(9):64-74.
[11] 张倩.从资源配置到制度安排——国际比较视域下的教师减负[J].教育研究，2022(2):29-43.
[12][25] Festini,S.B.Hertzog,C.McDonough,I.M.,& Park,D.C.What Makes Us Busy?Predictors of Perceived Busyness Across the Adult Lifespan[J].The Journal of General Psychology,2019(2):111-133.
[14][27][28][40] Perlow,Leslie.The Time Famine:Towards a Sociology of Work Time [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1999(1):57-81.
[16] Argyris,C.,Putnam,R.,& Smith,D.M..Action Science:Concepts,Methods,and Skills for Research and Intervention [M].San Francisco,CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers,1985.
[17][21][44] [美]格雷戈里·贝特森.心灵与自然：应然的合一[M].钱旭鸯，译.北京：北京师范大学出版社，2019:119-126,119-126,119-126.
[18][37] Weick,K.The Social Psychology of Organizing [M].London:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,1979:65-88,65-88.
[19][20] 陈向明，王富伟.高等学校辅导员双线晋升悖论——一项基于扎根理论的研究[J].教育研究，2021(2):80-96.
[23] Baker,P.L.Bored and Busy:Sociology of Knowledge of Clerical Workers [J].Sociological Perspectives,1992(3):489-503.
[29][38][39] [美]彼得·圣吉.第五项修炼：学习型组织的艺术与实践[M].张成林，译.北京：中信出版社，2009:8,174,87-99,200-201.
[33] Meyer,J.W.& Rowan,B.Institutionalized Organizations:Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony [J].American Journal of Sociology,1977(2):340-363.
[34] [美]克里斯·阿吉里斯，唐纳德·舍恩.组织学习[M].姜文波，译.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2011:19-23.
[35][41] Argyris C.Organizational Traps:Leadership,Culture,Organizational Design [M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2010.
[36] 梁漱溟.中国文化要义[M].上海：上海人民出版社，2005:231.
[42] Glaser,B.& Strauss,A.The Discovery of Grounded Theory:Strategies for Qualitative Research [M].Chicago:Aldine Publishing Company,1967:32-35.
[46] 李洁.重度拖延症与时间饥荒——同伴参照下的自我研究[Z].工作论文，2020.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G635.1
引用信息:
[1]王富伟,张森,谢珊,等.稳态循环或恶性循环?——教师之忙的扎根理论研究[J].全球教育展望,2022,51(08):71-91.
2022-01-09
2022
2022-05-04
2022-06-12
2022
1
2022-08-10
2022-08-10