nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2016, 01, v.45;No.342 94-104
美、德科学教育标准的比较与启示
基金项目(Foundation): 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(项目批准号:13YJA880022)中比较研究部分的阶段成果;; 国家留学基金委的支持
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2016-01-15
出版时间: 2016-01-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

科学教育存在多元传统。对美国和德国两个代表国家的科学教育标准进行比较分析发现,其科学教育纲领文件存同有异。基于对它们差异的分析,初步探索在全球化浪潮中对科学教育目标的多元设定。从它们的相同发展取向中,讨论如何深化中国科学教育目标中的人文蕴含、如何平衡科学理解与科学实践的关系等议题。

Abstract:

Pluralistic tradition existed in science education. This study examined two current practices of two typical countries—Germany and USA,to show both the cross-cultural trends and between—cultural difference. The article ends with a discussion about the humanistic spirit in science education and the balancing of scientific understanding and scientific practice.

参考文献

[1][4]Achieve.Taking the Lead in Science Education:Forging Next-Generation Science Standards[EB/OL].Washington,DC:Achieve 2010.http://www.achieve.org/international-sciencebenchmark-report,/2012-06-06.

[2]Wickman,P.,Liberg,C.&stman,L.Transcending Science:Scientific Literacy and Bildung for the 21st Century[A].In Jorde,D.&Dillon,J.(Eds.)Science Education Research and Practice in Europe[C].Rotterdam:Springer,2012.

[3]Crabtree,B.&Miller,W.Doing Qualitative Research in Primary Care(2nd edition)[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,1999:163-165.

[5]Waddington,D.,Nentwig,P.&Schanze,S.Making it Comparable:Standards in Science Education[M].Berlin:Waxmann,2007:14-15.

[6]NGSS Lead States.The Next Generation Science Standards[M].Washington DC:National Academies Press,2013:15.

[7][10][13]Klieme,E.et al.Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards[R].Berlin:Bundesministerium fuür Bildung und Forschung,2003.

[8]郭玉英,姚建欣,张静.整合与发展——科学课程中概念体系的建构及其学习进阶[J].课程·教材·教法,2013(2):44-49.

[9]郭玉英,姚建欣,彭征.美国《新一代科学教育标准》述评[J].课程·教材·教法,2013(8):118-127.

[11][26]Chiu,M&Duit,R.Globalization:Science Education from an International Perspective[J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2011,48(6):553-566.

[12]Jürgens,E.Pdagogische Implikationen der KMK-Entwürfe für Bildungsstandards[A].In Schlmerkemper J(Ed.),Bildung und Standards[C].Weinheim,Germany:Juvena,2004.

[14]唐小为,丁邦平.“科学探究”缘何变身“科学实践”?——解读美国科学教育框架理念的首位关键词之变[J].教育研究,2013(11):141-145.

[15]Klafki,W.The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung[A].In I.Westbury,S.,Hopmann&K.Riquarts(Eds.),Teaching as a Reflective Practice.The German Didaktik Tradition[C].Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,2000.

[16]Lederman,N.Nature of science:Past,present,and future[A].In S.Abell&Lederman,N.(Eds.),Handbook of research on science education[C].Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,2007.

[17]Weinert,F.Concepts of Competence[R].Neuchatel:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development,1999.

[18]Prenzel,M.,et al.Naturwissenschaftliche Grundbildung:Testkonzeption und Ergebnisse[A].In PISA2000:Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich[C].Leske und Budrich:Springer,2001.

[19]Zimmerman,C.The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills[J].Developmental Review,2000(1):99-149.

[20]姚建欣,郭玉英.为学生认知发展建模:学习进阶十年研究回顾及展望[J].教育学报,2014(5):35-42.

[21]Kauertz,A.&Fischer,H.Assessing students’level of knowledge and analysing the reasons for learning difficulties in physics by Rasch analysis[A].In X.Liu&W.Boone(Eds.),Applications of Rasch measurement in science education[C].Minneapolis,MN:JAM Press,2006.

[22]Mayer,J.,Grube,C.&Mller,A.Kompetenzmodellnaturwissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisgewinnung[A].In U.Harms&A.Sandmann(Eds.),Lehr-und Lernforschung in der Biologiedidaktik[C].Innsbruck,Austria:Studienverlag,2008(3).

[23]Bernholt,S.&Parchmann,I.Assessing the complexity of students'knowledge in chemistry[J].Chemistry Education Research and Practice,2011(2):167-173.

[24]Kauertz,A.,et al.Standardbezogene Kompetenzmodellierung in den Naturwissenschaften der Sekundarstufe I[J].Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften,2010(16):135-153.

[25]Fischler,H.Didaktik—An Appropriate Framework for the Professional Work of Science Teacher[A].In D.Corrigan,R.Gunstone&J.Dillon(Eds.),The professional knowledge base of science teaching[C].Heidelberg:Springer,2011.

[27]Roberts,D.Scientific literacy/science literacy[A].In S.K.Abell&N.G.Lederman(Eds.),Handbook of research on science education[C].Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum,2007.

[28]Sadler,T.&Zeidler,D.Scientific literacy,PISA and socioscientific discourse:Assessment for progressive aims of science education[J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2009(8):909–921.

[29]Kultusministerkonferenz.Bildungsstandards im Fach Physik für den mittleren Schulabschluss[M].Berlin:Luchterhand,2005:7.

[30]Zimmerman,C.The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school[J].Developmental Review,2007(2):172-223.

1 STEM的四个字母分别是科学、技术、工程和数学的简写。

1维纳特(Franz E.Weinert)教授(1930-2001),是德国著名心理学家,海德堡大学发展与教育心理学系的创始人,生前任马克思普朗克学会的副主席。

基本信息:

中图分类号:G511

引用信息:

[1]姚建欣,郭玉英,伊荷娜·诺曼.美、德科学教育标准的比较与启示[J].全球教育展望,2016,45(01):94-104.

基金信息:

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(项目批准号:13YJA880022)中比较研究部分的阶段成果;; 国家留学基金委的支持

发布时间:

2016-01-15

出版时间:

2016-01-15

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索