nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
您当前所在位置: 首页> 文献列表> 师生互动的实证研究:中芬法澳四国中学数学课堂中的师生互动
2019, 01, v.48;No.378 71-81
师生互动的实证研究:中芬法澳四国中学数学课堂中的师生互动
基金项目(Foundation): 澳大利亚研究委员会(ARC)基金The Lexicon Project:Analysing Pedagogical Naming Systems from Different Cultures to Reconceptualise Classroom Practice and Advance Educational Theory(项目编号:DP140101361);; 全国教育科学“十三五”规划2018年度青年专项课题“形式与功能:中美芬数学课堂关键教学行为比较研究”(项目编号:EHA180480)的阶段性成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
投稿时间: 2017-11-28
投稿日期(年): 2017
修回时间: 2018-03-03
终审时间: 2018-05-17
终审日期(年): 2018
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2019-01-10
出版时间: 2019-01-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

师生互动是中学数学课堂中的关键教学行为。通过选取中国、芬兰、法国和澳大利亚四个国家中学数学课堂录像进行实证研究,探寻出中芬法澳课堂中师生互动模式的可能形态:整体态势上中国课堂中的师生互动较为静态,并表现出教师主导性;而芬法澳三国的师生互动更为动态。互动模式1:教师提问-学生回答是各国主导的师生互动模式,中国尤甚;中国的互动模式1与芬法澳迥异,主要表现在互动对象上;互动模式2:学生提问-教师回答在中国课堂几乎缺失;互动模式3:教师讲解-学生听讲是各国课堂知识传输的主要媒介,中国课堂中尤甚;互动模式4:学生做题-教师辅导中的教师辅导,在中国主要表现为全班集中讲解,体现出集体主义色彩,在芬法澳课堂中主要是个性化、针对性的小组或个别辅导;互动模式5:课堂管理在芬法澳课堂是重要的师生互动形式,中国课堂缺失。

Abstract:

Teacher-student interaction is one of the Critical Pedagogy Behavior(CPB)in middle school mathematics classrooms.This empirical study,drawn on the selected videos of middle school mathematics classrooms in China,Finland,France and Australia,aimed to explore the similarities and differences between these countries.The conclusions are as follows:Overall,the teacherstudent interaction in the China classrooms appear to be less dynamic compared to the classrooms in the other countries;Interaction Model 1:Teacher questioning-student answering is the dominant type of interaction in all four countries but is more frequently seen in the Chinese classrooms;Interaction Model 2:Student questioning-teacher answering is rarely found in the Chinese classrooms;Interaction Model 3:Teacher explaining-student listening is the main medium of knowledge transmission,especially in the Chinese classrooms;For Interaction Model 4:Student doing exercise-teacher mentoring is often carried out as whole class instruction reflecting the collectivist pedagogical character in China,while in Australia,France and Finland,is more likely to be individual-or group-targeted;Interaction Model 5:Classroom management is an important form of interaction between teachers and students in the Australia,France and Finland classrooms but is not evident in the Chinese classrooms.

参考文献

[1]党建强.师生互动理论的多学科视野[J].当代教育科学,2005(11):14-17+35.

[2]杨素珍.师生互动,创造有活力的数学教学[J].全球教育展望,2003(12):77-78.

[3]曹一鸣,于国文.中学数学课堂教学行为关键性层级研究[J].数学教育学报,2017(1):1-6.

[4]李松林.课堂教学行为分析引论[J].教育理论与实践,2005(4):48-51.

[5]曹一鸣,贺晨.初中数学课堂师生互动行为主体类型研究——基于LPS项目课堂录像资料[J].数学教育学报,2009(5):38-41.

[6]曹一鸣,王玉蕾,王立东.中学数学课堂师生话语权的量化研究——基于LPS项目课堂录像资料[J].数学教育学报,2008(3):1-3.

[7]叶子,庞丽娟.师生互动研究述评[J].学前教育研究,2009(3):44-48.

[8]Cohen,L.,Mansion,L.&Morrison,K.教育研究方法[M].程亮,宋萑,沈丽萍,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2015.

[9]Kirk,J.&Miller,M.L.Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research[M].Beverly Hills,CA:Sage,1986.

[10]Clarke,D.J.,Xu,L.&Wan,M.E.V.Choral Response as a Significant Form of Verbal Response in Mathematics Classrooms in Seven Countries[A].Lindmeier,A.M.&Heinze,A.Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education[C].Germany:PME,2013:201-208.

[11]黄荣金,汪甄南.沪港澳中学数学课堂教学之比较[J].数学教育学报,2007(5):77-81.

[12]教育部.义务教育数学课程标准(2011年版)[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2012.

[13]Finnish National Board of Education.National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014[S].Helsinki:Next Print Oy,2014.

[14]赖新元.法国中小学教育特色与借鉴[M].北京:中国戏剧出版社,2009.

[15]Assessment and Reporting Authority(ACARA).Information Sheet:A Curriculum for All Young Australians[EB/OL].http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/static_20110609161813/docs/Information%20Sheet%20A%20curriculum%20for%20all%20young%20Australians.pdf,2011-3-8/2017-1-28.

[16]曹一鸣.中国数学课堂教学模式及其发展研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2007.

[17]Novotná,J.&Ho2pesová,A.Students and Their Teacher in a Didactical Situation:A Case Study[A].Kaur,B.et al.Student Voice in Mathematics Classrooms around the World[C].Rotterdam:Sense Publishers,2013:133-142.

[18]Mok,I.A.C.A Tale of Two Cities:A Comparison of Six Teachers in Hong Kong and Shanghai[A].Clarke,D.J.,Keitel,C.&Shimizu,Y.Mathematics Classrooms In Twelve Countries:The Insider's Perspective[C].Rotterdam:Sense Publishers,2006:237-246.

[19]杨敏.法国高中实践活动课程的经验与启示[J].教学与管理,2006(7):78-80.

[20]Mok,I.A.C.&Morris,P.The Metamorphosis of the‘Virtuoso’:Pedagogic Patterns in Hong Kong Primary Mathematics Classrooms[J].Teaching and Teacher Education:An International Journal of Research and Studies,2001(4):455-468.

[21]Phuong,N.,Terlouw,C.&Pilot,A.Cooperative Learning vs Confucian Heritage Culture's Collectivism:Confrontation to Reveal Some Cultural Conflicts and Mismatch[J].Asia Europe Journal,2005(3):403-419.

(1)仅呈现编码框架,未呈现完整的编码表。编码采用的是NVivo质性分析软件。

基本信息:

中图分类号:G633.6

引用信息:

[1]于国文,曹一鸣,David Clarke,等.师生互动的实证研究:中芬法澳四国中学数学课堂中的师生互动[J].全球教育展望,2019,48(01):71-81.

基金信息:

澳大利亚研究委员会(ARC)基金The Lexicon Project:Analysing Pedagogical Naming Systems from Different Cultures to Reconceptualise Classroom Practice and Advance Educational Theory(项目编号:DP140101361);; 全国教育科学“十三五”规划2018年度青年专项课题“形式与功能:中美芬数学课堂关键教学行为比较研究”(项目编号:EHA180480)的阶段性成果

投稿时间:

2017-11-28

投稿日期(年):

2017

修回时间:

2018-03-03

终审时间:

2018-05-17

终审日期(年):

2018

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2019-01-10

出版时间:

2019-01-10

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索