| 644 | 1 | 207 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
跨学科整合已成为教育改革与教学创新的关键取向，其核心在于突破学科壁垒，重建有机联系，提升学生综合运用知识解决真实问题的能力。基于理论梳理，本文提出“维度—原型”框架，将跨学科课程设计要素划分为组织载体、知识结构、目标评价、方法工具四个维度，并据此概括出主题取向、项目取向、概念取向、能力取向与方法论取向五种国际主流路径。比较分析表明，五种路径各有侧重，但在理念与实践上呈现“差异—共性—互补”的动态关联，与核心素养导向改革高度契合。在此基础上，本文提出中国语境下的路径选择与实施策略，为跨学科课程设计与实施提供系统性分析框架与实践参照。
Abstract：Interdisciplinary integration has become a key direction in educational reform and pedagogical innovation. Its essence lies in transcending disciplinary boundaries, rebuilding organic connections, and strengthening students' capacity to apply knowledge comprehensively to solve real-world problems. Building on a theoretical review, this article proposes a “dimension-prototype” framework that classifies the essential elements of interdisciplinary curriculum design into four dimensions: organisational carrier, knowledge structure, goal and evaluation, and methodological tools. Accordingly, it outlines five mainstream international pathways of interdisciplinary integration: theme-oriented, project-oriented, concept-oriented, competency-oriented, and methodology-oriented approaches. Comparative analysis shows that while each pathway has a distinct focus, they exhibit a dynamic interplay of “differences-commonalities-complementarities” in both educational philosophy and practical logic, aligning closely with key competencies-based reform. Building on international experience, the article further proposes context-specific strategies for pathway selection and implementation in China, providing a systematic analytical framework and practical reference for the design and enactment of interdisciplinary curricula.
[1] National Academy of Sciences,National Academy of Engineering,and Institute of Medicine.Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2005:27.
[2] 李学书.STEAM跨学科课程：整合理念、模式构建及问题反思[J].全球教育展望，2019(10):59-72.
[3] 中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育课程方案(2022年版)[S].北京：北京师范大学出版社，2022:5,11.
[4] 董艳，夏亮亮，王良辉.新课标背景下的跨学科学习：内涵、设置逻辑、实践原则与基础[J].现代教育技术，2023(2):24-32.
[5][29] 张文超，陈名瑞.跨学科整合的价值意蕴、基本取向与实施理路[J].教育理论与实践，2023(29):3-7.
[6] 刘传莉，马勇军，王元凯.跨学科课程整合的内在逻辑与推进路径[J].当代教育科学，2024(11):36-43.
[7] 李贵范，郭洞天.跨学科教学中学科知识整合的本质与路径研究[J].教学与管理，2024(27):68-71.
[8] Klein,J.T.Interdisciplinarity:History,Theory,and Practice [M].Detroit,MI:Wayne State University Press,1990:24.
[9] Jantsch,E.Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation [A].Apostel,L.,Berger,G.,Briggs,A.,et al.Interdisciplinarity:Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities [C].Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,1972:97-121.
[10] Stember,M.Advancing the Social Sciences Through the Interdisciplinary Enterprise [J].The Social Science Journal,1991(1):1-14.
[11] Manolakelli,A.Inter,Multi,Cross,Trans,& Intra-disciplinary:What is the Difference and Why is It Important?[EB/OL].https://www.archpsych.co.uk/post/disciplinarities-definitions,2022-03-18/2025-07-02.
[12] Jacobs,H.H.Interdisciplinary Curriculum:Design and Implementation [M].Alexandria,VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,1989:14.
[13] Fogarty,R.Ten Ways to Integrate Curriculum [J].Educational Leadership,1991(2):61-65.
[14][17][18] Drake,S.M.& Burns,R.C.Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum [M].Alexandria,VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,2004:12,17,80.
[15] Klein,J.T.A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity [A].Frodeman,R.,Klein,J.T.,& Mitcham,C.The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity [C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2010:15-30.
[16] 詹森云，邓莉.培养核心素养：芬兰多学科学习模块的实施途径与启示[J].福建教育，2021(31):21-24.
[19] 崔允漷，郭洪瑞.跨学科主题学习：课程话语自主建构的一种尝试[J].教育研究，2023(10):44-53.
[20] Lave,J.& Wenger,E.Situated Learning:Legitimate Peripheral Participation [M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1991:32-33.
[21] 吴刚平.跨学科主题学习的意义与设计思路[J].课程·教材·教法，2022(9):53-55.
[22] 崔允漷，王少非，杨澄宇，等.新课程关键词[M].北京：教育科学出版社，2023:73.
[23] Ackerman,D.Intellectual and Practical Criteria for Successful Curriculum Integration [A].Jacobs,H.H.Interdisciplinary Curriculum:Design and Implementation [C].Alexandria,VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,1989:25-38.
[24] 郭华，等.跨学科主题学习：是什么?怎么做?[M].北京：教育科学出版社，2023:80.
[25] 王超男，郭莉，邓莉.可持续性教育融入中小学课程：芬兰的经验[J].世界教育信息，2024(1):38-49.
[26] 伍红林，田莉莉.跨学科主题学习：溯源、内涵与实施建议[J].全球教育展望，2023(3):35-47.
[27] Buck Institute for Education.Gold Standard PBL:Essential Project Design Elements [EB/OL].https://www.pblworks.org/what-is-pbl/gold-standard-project-design,2025-05-14.
[28] 夏雪梅.跨学科项目化学习：内涵、设计逻辑与实践原型[J].课程·教材·教法，2022(10):78-84.
[30] 余胜泉，胡翔.STEM教育理念与跨学科整合模式[J].开放教育研究，2015(4):13-22.
[31] Buck Institute for Education.Making Space for Change [EB/OL].https://my.pblworks.org/project/making-space-change,2025-05-14.
[32] 刘登珲，卞冰冰.大概念统摄下的STEM课程一体化建构策略——STEM Road Map的实践与启示[J].全球教育展望，2022(4):101-111.
[33] Erickson,H.L.,Lanning,L.A.,& French,R.Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction for the Thinking Classroom (2nd ed.) [M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Corwin Press,2017:12-28.
[34] 邓莉.如何在教学上落实21世纪技能：探究性学习及其反思和启示[J].教育发展研究，2017(8):77-84.
[35] [新西兰]约翰·哈蒂，[澳]格雷戈里·C.R.耶茨.可见的学习与学习科学[M].彭正梅，邓莉，伍绍杨，等，译.北京：教育科学出版社，2018:87-88.
[36] 武倩，裴新宁.利用跨学科概念促进科学学习——基于美国与德国科学课程相关文本分析[J].比较教育学报，2024(6):162-171.
[37] Davies,M.& Devlin,M.Interdisciplinary Higher Education:Implications for Teaching and Learning [R].Melbourne:Centre for the Study of Higher Education,University of Melbourne,2007:3-4.
[38] 王晶莹，杜蕾，干沈成，等.跨学科课程开发的理念导向、逻辑框架和实践向度：来自IB课程的启示[J].外国教育研究，2024(12):16-29.
[39] [美]林恩·埃里克森，洛伊斯·兰宁.以概念为本的课程与教学：培养核心素养的绝佳实践[M].鲁效孔，译.上海：华东师范大学出版社，2018:22.
[40] Brown,N.J.S.& Wilson,M.A Model of Cognition:The Missing Cornerstone of Assessment [J].Educational Psychology Review,2011(2):221-234.
[41] 邓莉.培养具有全球竞争力的人才——美国21世纪能力教育改革研究[M].上海：上海教育出版社，2019:65-67.
[42] 周文叶.核心素养的课程转化：以美国为例[J].教育发展研究，2017(12):38-45.
[43] Partnership for 21st Century Skills.21st Century Skills Map [EB/OL].https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519502.pdf,2010-08-11/2025-06-14.
[44][46] Adler,C.,Hadorn,H.G.,Breu,T.,et al.Conceptualizing the Transfer of Knowledge Across Cases in Transdisciplinary Research [J].Sustainability Science,2018(1):179-190.
[45] Newell,W.H.A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies [J].Issues in Integrative Studies,2001,19:1-25.
[47] University of Cambridge.Mathematical Biology (Part II,Mathematical Tripos) [EB/OL].https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/mathbio.html,2025-06-15.
[48] Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.Press Release:The Nobel Prize in Physics 2024 [EB/OL].https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/press-release/,2024-10-08/2025-06-11.
[49] Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.Press Release:The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2024 [EB/OL].https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/press-release/,2024-10-09/2025-06-11.
[50] Digital Humanities @ Stanford.About DH at Stanford [EB/OL].https://digitalhumanities.stanford.edu/about-dh-stanford/,2025-05-25.
[51] Lenoir,Y.& Hasni,A.Interdisciplinarity in Primary and Secondary School:Issues and Perspectives [J].Creative Education,2016(16):2433-2458.
[52] Warren,A.M.Project-Based Learning Across the Disciplines:Plan,Manage,and Assess Through +1 Pedagogy [M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Corwin (SAGE),2016:3.
[53] Deng,L.,Wu,Y.,Chen,L.,et al.“Pursuing Competencies” or “Pursuing Scores”?High School Teachers' Perceptions and Practices of Competency-Based Education Reform in China [J].Teaching and Teacher Education,2024(5):104510.
[54] Deng,L.Translating Global Policy into Local Reality:Key Competencies-Based Education Reform in China [M].London:Routledge,2025:187-193.
(1)此案例来源于莱比锡大学跨学科教学研讨会内部成果文档。
基本信息:
中图分类号:G420
引用信息:
[1]邓莉,缪秋英,蔡俞静,等.跨学科整合的国际主流路径：比较分析与本土化启示[J].全球教育展望,2025,54(12):90-105.
基金信息:
中央高校基本科研业务费华东师范大学引进人才启动费项目(项目编号：2021ECNU-HLYT048)的研究成果
2025-09-03
2025
2025-11-06
2025
2025-10-18
1
2025-12-15
2025-12-15