| 1,372 | 12 | 329 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
作为科学素养的重要组成部分，科学论证是科学思维的关键内容，同时体现了科学实践的价值属性，计算机支持的科学论证教学必然成为当下科学教育的热点领域。本文首先通过阐述概念认识和实践模型揭示科学论证的本质内涵，基于此厘清计算机支持的科学论证教学的技术功能，即在线论证辅助教学平台聚焦证据支持与认知提示，文本与图形化认知工具重在外显思维与论证过程，虚拟实验应用程序支持探究实践与过程模拟，智能反馈评估模型实现思维聚类与个性化反馈。之后，回归技术环境中的科学论证教学实践，基于“论证助学”剖析主流教学模式，即协作论证、支架式论证、游戏化论证和混合学习论证。最后，提出建议：重视“论证助学”理念，倡导教学模式的本土创新；具身营造科学论证的问题情境，优化技术支持环节；深度开展科学论证教学活动培训，构建课堂论证话语体系；探索科学论证教学的认知神经机制，加强科学论证的实证研究；推进教—学—评协同联动，发挥智能技术的思维评价优势。
Abstract：As an important component of scientific literacy, scientific argumentation is the key content of scientific thinking and reflects the value of scientific practice. It is inevitable that computer-supported argumentation teaching becomes a hot topic in current scientific education. This article begins by elucidating the essence of scientific argumentation by elaborating the conceptual understanding and practice model. Based on this, it clarifies the technical functions of computer-supported scientific argumentation teaching, including online argumentation-assisted teaching platform focusing on evidence support and cognitive prompts, text and graphical cognitive tools emphasizing explicit thinking and argumentation processes, virtual experiment applications supporting inquiry practices and process simulations, and intelligent feedback evaluation models enabling thought clustering and personalized feedback. Subsequently, returning to the practice of argumentation teaching in a technological environment, it analyzes mainstream teaching modes based on the “argumentation-assisted learning” perspective, including collaborative argumentation, scaffolded argumentation, gamified argumentation and blended learning argumentation. Finally, it proposes recommendations to emphasize the concept of “argumentation-assisted learning” and advocate local innovations in teaching modes; embody problem situations conducive to scientific argumentation, optimize technical support links; deeply carry out argumentation teaching activities, construct a classroom argumentation discourse system; explore the cognitive and neural mechanisms of argumentation teaching, strengthen empirical research on scientific argumentation; promote the synergy of teaching, learning, and assessment, and leverage the thinking assessment advantages of intelligent technology.
[1] 任红艳.科学教育中论证教学的缺失与回归[J].教育研究与实验，2018(4):57-61.
[2] [英]卡尔·波普尔.科学发现的逻辑[M].查汝强，邱仁宗，万木春，译.北京：中国美术学院出版社，2008:26.
[3] [美]托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构(第四版) [M].伊安·哈金，导读.金吾伦，胡新和，译.北京：北京大学出版社，2012:14,91.
[4] Erduran,S.& Jiménez-Aleixandre,M.P.Argumentation in Science Education,Perspectives from Classroom-based Research[M].Berlin:Springer,2007:47.
[5] Walton,D.N.Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation[M].New York,NY:State University of New York Press,1992:28.
[6] 宋歌，王祖浩.实践转向的科学论证教学：国际研究新进展[J].比较教育研究，2018(7):59-67.
[7] Toulmin,S.E.The Uses of Argument[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1958:48.
[8] McNeill,K.L.& Krajcik,J.J.Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science:The Claim,Evidence,and Reasoning Framework for Talk and Writing[M].New York,NY:Pearson Education Group,2012:96,100.
[9] Chang,S.& Chiu,M.Lakatos' Scientific Research Programmes as a Framework for Analysing Informal Argumentation about Socio-scientific Issues[J].International Journal of Science Education,2008(13):1753-1773.
[10] Kyza,E.A.Middle-school Students' Reasoning About Alternative Hypotheses in a Scaffolded,Software-based Inquiry Investigation[J].Cognition and Instruction,2009(4):277-311.
[11] Tsai,C.Y.,Jack,B.M.,Huang,T.C.,et al.Using the Cognitive Apprenticeship Web-based Argumentation System to Improve Argumentation Instruction[J].Journal of Science Education and Technology,2012(10):476-486.
[12] Akp?nar,Y.,Arda?,D.,& Er-Amuce,N.Development and Validation of an Argumentation based Multimedia Science Learning Environment:Preliminary Findings[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2014(21):3848-3853.
[13] Lin,Y.Student Positions and Web-based Argumentation with the Support of the Six Thinking Hats[J].Computers & Education,2019(10):191-206.
[14] Ge,X.,Turk,M.,& Hung,W.Revisiting Cognitive Tools from a Social and Motivational Perspective[J].Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,2019(2):39-51.
[15] Dwyer,C.P.,Stewart,M.J.,& Ian,H.The Evaluation of Argument Mapping as a Learning Tool:Comparing the Effects of Map Reading Versus Text Reading on Comprehension and Recall of Arguments[J].Thinking Skills and Creativity,2010(1):16-22.
[16] Su,G.,& Long,T.Is the Text-based Cognitive Tool More Effective Than the Concept Map on Improving the Pre-service Teachers' Argumentation Skills?[J].Thinking Skills and Creativity,2021(9):100862.
[17] Kinik,T.A.Development of Scientific Inquiry Skills of Science Teaching Through Argument-focused Virtual Laboratory Applications[J].Journal of Baltic Science Education,2020(4):628-646.
[18][25] Noroozi,O.,Dehghanzadeh,H.,& Talaee,E.A systematic Review on the Impacts of Game-based Learning on Argumentation Skills[J].Entertainment Computing,2020(8):100369.
[19] Wallon,R.C.,Jasti,C.,Lauren,H.Z.G.,et al.Implementation of a Curriculum-integrated Computer Game for Introducing Scientific Argumentation[J].Journal of Science Education and Technology,2018(12):236-247.
[20] Gould,D.L.& Parekh,P.Mentoring and Argumentation in a Game-infused Science Curriculum[J].Journal of Science Education and Technology,2018(11):188-203.
[21] Zhu,M.,Liu,O.L.,& Lee,H-S.The Effect of Automated Feedback on Revision Behavior and Learning Gains in Formative Assessment of Scientific Argument Writing[J].Computers & Education,2020(1):103668.
[22] Kern,C.& Crippen,K.A Design Framework and Research Program for Enacting Science Cyberlearning:Proceeding of Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education [C].San Diego,CA:Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE),2013.
[23] Kern,C.& Crippen,K.Heather Skaza The Fidelity and Usability of 5-DIE:A Design Study of Enacted Cyberlearning[J].Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,2014(1):49-72.
[24] Kim,H.S.& Oh,E.G.Scaffolding Argumentation in Asynchronous Online Discussion:Using Students' Perceptions to Refine a Design Framework[J].International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design,2018(2):29-43.
[26] Tsai,C-Y.,Lin,H-S.,& Liu,S-C.The Effect of Pedagogical GAME Model on Students' PISA Scientific Competencies[J].Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,2020(3):359-369.
[27] Wahyuni,S.,Sanjaya,I.M.,Erman,E.,& Jatmiko,B.Edmodo-based Blended Learning Model as an Alternative of Science Learning to Motivate and Improve Junior High School Students' Scientific Critical Thinking Skills[J].International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning,2019(7):98-110.
[28] Lam,Y.W.,Hew,K.F.,& Chiu,T.F.Improving Argumentative Writing:Effects of a Blended Learning Approach and Gamification[J].Language Learning & Technology,2018(1):97-118.
[29] 邓阳，王后雄.科学教育中融入科学论证的必要性分析——基于科学本体、科学学习和国际比较视角[J].外国中小学教育，2014(3):60-65.
[30] Backman,Y.,Gardelli,T.,Gardelli,V.,et al.Group Argumentation Development through Philosophical Dialogues for Persons with Acquired Brain Injuries[J].International Journal of Disability,Development and Education,2020(1):107-123.
[31] Zhai,X.,Haudek,K.C.,& Ma,W.Assessing Argumentation Using Machine Learning and Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling[J].Research in Science Education,2023(7):405-424.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G434
引用信息:
[1]王晶莹,周丹华,吕贝贝.计算机支持的科学论证教学：本质、功能与模式[J].全球教育展望,2023,52(10):3-17.
基金信息:
北京市教育科学规划“十四五”2022年度优先关注课题“大数据教育评价研究”(项目编号：CDEA22008)的研究成果