| 892 | 33 | 72 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
政策工具是政府为实现特定的政策目标而运用的手段与机制,作为联结政策目标和政策结果的桥梁,具有价值负载、目标导向和间接作用三个特点。根据核心价值和作用机制,可将政策工具分为五类,即权威性、市场化、社会化、管理性和综合创新型工具。本世纪以来,纽约市公立学校系统进行了剧烈改革,期间创造性地广泛运用了上述各类工具,对推动改革起到了关键作用。纽约市相关实践对中国基础教育具有启示意义。
Abstract：Policy instrument is the means and mechanism of government to achieve specific objectives,it is a bridge to link policy goals and results,with value-loaded,goal-oriented and indirect effect as its three characteristics. According to core value and the function mechanism,policy instruments can be divided into five categories,namely authoritative instruments,marketoriented instruments,social instruments, managerial instruments,and comprehensive innovative instruments. Since this century,New York City public school system carried out drastic reforms,creatively applied the above all kinds of instruments which played a key role for promoting the reform. New York City's related reform practice has implications for China education.
[1]Lorraine,M.,Mc Donnell,Richard,F.&Elmore.Getting the Job Done:Alternative Policy Instruments[J].Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,1987,9(2):133-152.
[2]Anne Schneider&Helen Ingram.Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools[J].Journal of Politics,1990,52(52):510-529.
[3]吴合文.高等教育政策工具分析[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011:63.
[4]郑彩华.美国纽约市中小学生纪律管理及其启示[J].教学与管理,2010(31):75-77.
[5]New York City Department of Education.Discipline Code[EB/OL].[2013-12-18].http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/9E2A4768-4FEB-4A9D-A1B1-1D5AD429FC3C/0/Disc Code Cond Type2013_Chinese.pdf.
[6][7][8][9][10]Jennifer,A.,O'Day,Catherine,S.,Bitter,Louis,M.&Gomez.Education Reform in New York City:Ambitious Change in the Nation's Most Complex School System[M].Cambridge:Harvard Education Press,2011:222,38-39,39,40,40.
[11]New York City Department of Education.Quality Review[EB/OL].[2014-02-13].http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/tools/review/Process/Overview/default.htm.
[12]胡仲勋.21世纪以来纽约市公立学校系统赋权问责改革:背景、演进与评析[J].外国教育研究,2015(9):28-39.
[13]中国新闻网.纽约公布中小学进步评级华人集中学校多得A[EB/OL].[2014-01-18].http://www.chinanews.com/hr/2012/10-03/4226196.shtml.
[14][15]Stacey Childress,et al.Focus on Results at the New York City Department of Education[A].Stacey,M.Childress(ed.).Transforming Public Education:Case in Education Entrepreneurship[C].Cambridge:Harvard Education Press,2009:267,279.
[16]翟静丽.美国城市学区投资组合管理模式及其启示[J].中国教育学刊,2015(1):35-40.
[17]New York City Department of Education.Portfolio Planning[EB/OL].[2013-12-30].http://schools.nyc.gov/community/planning/default.htm.
[18]Ka-Ho Mok.Globalisation and Governance:Educational Policy Instruments and Regulatory Arrangements[J].International Review of Education,2005,51(4):289-311.
(1)资料来源:胡仲勋.21世纪以来纽约市公立学校系统赋权问责改革:背景、演进与评析[J].外国教育研究,2015(9):28-39;Jennifer A.O'Day,Catherine S.Bitter&Louis M.Gomez.Education Reform in New York City:Ambitious Change in the Nation's Most Complex School System[M].Cambridge:Harvard Education Press,2011:103.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G571.2
引用信息:
[1]胡仲勋,俞可.以政策工具创新推进公共教育改革——基于纽约市教育局的经验[J].全球教育展望,2016,45(03):81-89.
基金信息:
上海地方高校大文科研究生学术新人培育计划课题“纽约市教育改革中的政策工具创新与运用”(项目编号:B-6002-13-003038)资助