| 1,799 | 43 | 75 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
科学素养是科学与技术教育的核心目标,但关于它究竟"是什么"或者"应该是什么",学界一直众说纷纭。美国科学教育在经历了知识习得、技能训练、本质理解、价值意识、社会参与、身份认同、读写本义等诸多观念之间的争论后,呈现出一种从"职业科学"转向"日常实践"的趋势,尤其明显地表现在2011年发布的《K-12年级科学教育框架》中。这一"日常实践"的科学素养观强调科学理论与方法、认识论框架与社会实践活动的统一,以及为解决日常问题而运用科学知识的能力。在这种观念下,科学教育应促进学生对科学认识论的深入理解,帮助学生在日常情境与科学问题之间建立联系,并培养学生获取、处理、辨别与表达科学信息的能力。
Abstract：Scientific literacy has long been a central goal of science and technology education.There is little consensus,however,with respect to what scientific literacy is or what it ought to be.Influential theories in the United States include: scientific literacy as knowledge acquisition,as skill training,as understanding the nature of science,as appreciating the importance of science in society, as participating in sociopolitical practices, as developing identities, as reading and writing science texts,and so forth. There is currently an "everyday practice"turn in the U.S.science education,strongly suggested in the framework for the Next Generation Science Standards released in 2011,that highlights the three-part harmony among conceptual,epistemic,and social aspects of science learning,as well as literacy as solving everyday problems relevant to science.Following this turn,science education should develop students' epistemological understandings of science,capacities of connecting science and everyday life,and the competence in obtaining,processing,evaluating,and communicating relevant scientific information.
[1]Hurd,P.D.Science literacy:Its Meaning for American Schools[J].Educational Leadership,1958(1):13-16.
[2]Rockefeller Brothers Fund.The Pursuit of Excellence:Education and the Future of America.In Prospect for America:Report Number V of the Rockefeller Panel Reports[M].Garden City,NY:Doubleday,1958.
[3]Shen,B.S.P.Views:Science Literacy:Public Understanding of Science is Becoming Vitally needed in Developing and Industrialized Countries Alike[J].American Scientist,1975(3):265-268.
[4]National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[M].Washington,DC:National Academy Press,1996.
[5]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Assessing Scientific,Reading and Mathematical Literacy:A Framework for PISA 2006[M].Paris:OECD Publishing,2006:31-34.
[6]Lederman,N.G.,Abd-El-Khalick,F.,Bell,R.L.&Schwartz,R.Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire:Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessments of Learners’Conceptions of Nature of Science[J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2002(6):497-521.
[7]Shamos,M.The Myth of Scientific Literacy[M].New Brunswick,NJ:Rutgers University Press,1995.
[8]Eisenhart,M.,Finkel,E.&Marion,S.F.Creating the Conditions for Scientific Literacy:A Reexamination[J].American Educational Research Journal,1996(2):261-295.
[9]Hodson,D.Going Beyond Cultural Pluralism:Science Education for Sociopolitical Action[J].Science Education,1999(6):775-796.
[10]Vygotsky,L.S.Mind in Society:The Development of Higher Psychological Processes[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1978.
[11]Lemke,J.L.Talking Science:Language,Learning and Values[M].Norwood,NJ:Ablex Publishing Corporation,1990.
[12]Gee,J.P.Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education[J].Review of Research in Education,2001(25):99-125.
[13][14]Brown,B.A.,Reveles,J.M.&Kelly,G.J.Scientific Literacy and Discursive Identity:ATheoretical Framework for Understanding Science Learning[J].Science Education,2005(5):779-802.
[15]Norris,S.P.&Phillips,L.M.How literacy in its Fundamental Sense is Central to Scientific Literacy[J].Science Education,2003(2):224-240.
[16][26]Feinstein,N.W.Salvaging Science Literacy[J].Science Education,2011(1):168-185.
[17]Bromme,R.Thinking and Knowing about Knowledge[C].Hoffmann,M.H.G.,Lenhard J.&Seeger,F.Activity and Sign-grounding Mathematics Education[M].New York,NY:Springer,2005:191-201.
[18]Jiménez-Aleixandre,M.-P.&Pereiro-Munoz,C.Knowledge Producers or Knowledge Consumers?Argumentation and Decision Making about Environmental Management[J].International Journal of Science Education,2002(11):1171-1190.
[19]Ratcliffe,M.Pupil Decision-making about Socio-scientific Issues within the Science Curriculum[J].International Journal of Science Education,1997(2):167-182.
[20]Sadler,T.D.&Zeidler,D.L.The Morality of Socioscientific Issues:Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas[J].Science Education,2004(1):4-27.
[21][22][23][24]National Research Council.Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards[M].Washington,DC:National Academy Press,2011:1,49,31,31.
[25]Duschl,R.A.Science Education in Three-Part Harmony:Balancing Conceptual,Epistemic,and Social Learning Goals[J].Review of Research in Education,2008(1):268-291.
[27]Cavagnetto,A.R.Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy:A Review of Argument Interventions in K-12 Science Contexts[J].Review of Educational Research,2010(3):336-371.
[28]KolstΦ,S.D.Scientific Literacy for Citizenship:Tools for Dealing with the Science Dimension of Controversial Socioscientific Issues[J].Science Education,2001(3):291-310.
[29]许翔杰,陈李娜.高中生的社会性科学议题解决能力及其与科学本质观的关系[J].教育学报,2016(4):29-38.
[30]Ford,M.J.Educational Implications of Choosing“Practice”to Describe Science in the Next Generation Science Standards[J].Science Education,2015(6):1041-1048.
[31]Xiao,S.&Sandoval,W.A.Influences of Argument Instruction on Children’s Use of Evidence in Socioscientific Issues[C].Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association.Chicago,IL,2015.
(1)另外两维是自然(nature)身份认同和体制(institutional)身份认同。
(2)例如illiterate通常译为“文盲”,便是取其本义——不识字的人。
基本信息:
DOI：
中图分类号:G301
引用信息:
[1]肖思汉.论科学素养的“日常实践”转向[J].全球教育展望,2017,46(11):12-20.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划教育学青年课题“重塑科学课堂教学模式实证研究——以课堂争论为载体”(项目编号:CHA160206)的阶段性成果