| 1,406 | 24 | 139 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
中美历史教学的学科素养关注点存有差异。依据PISA教育理念、历史学科特性,从学生对历史知识的理解、历史知识在新情境中的运用、对历史学科方法的反思、历史元认知的发展等维度,对其作了比较。美国历史教学有较细化的学科结构分层,关注学生对学科结构的理解,重视对历史学科方法、历史元认知的反思,着眼于学生应对未来生活的适应性与灵活性,这些都对当前我国历史教学有重要的启示与借鉴。
Abstract:There are differences of subject literacy in history teaching between Sino- U.S.A. On the basis of PISA education concept and history features, the paper analyzes the differences of subject literacy in history teaching between Sino- U.S.A from the aspects of understanding history knowledge,utilizing history knowledge in the new situation, reflecting on history method, and developing history meta- cognitive. In fact, these aspects which include more detailed discipline structure, more attention to reflect of history method and history meta- cognitive and more adapting and flexible to life in the future, are all worth learning for the current Chinese history teaching.
[1]曹宝龙.PISA的学科素养定义的教育启示[J].上海教育科研,2013(7):1.
[2]张民选.专业视野中的PISA[J].教育研究,2011(6):5.
[3][8][10][11][12]【美】M.苏珊娜·多诺万.学生是如何学习的———课堂中的历史[M].张晓光译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2011:36-37,47,95,144.
[4][9]赵亚夫.国外历史课程标准评介[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2005:55-65.
[5]【美】H.Lynn Erickson.概念为本的课程与教学[M].兰英译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2003:161-162.
[6]【美】Eric Jensen Le Ann Nickelsen.深度学习的7种有力策略[M].温暖译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010:211.
[7]徐勤稢.“Literacy”:PISA素养观背后的教育学立场[J].外国中小学教育,2012(1):22.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G633.51
引用信息:
[1]王德民.中美历史教学的学科素养关注点差异分析与启示[J].全球教育展望,2015,44(08):123-128.