| 1,223 | 26 | 242 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
教材是一种特殊的社会语言，具有区别于其他文本的独特的媒介性。这种媒介性具有多元性与嵌套性、时代性与国别性、二重性与多模性的特点，是支撑“教材学”走向学科的重要的观念范式。基于媒介性的“教材学”,在知识生产、学科结构、研究队伍和研究方法等方面呈现出独特的样态。未来推动“教材学”的学科建设，应实现从“用教材研究”到“对教材的研究”的转向，落实增设二级学科与设置研究方向并举，并推动官方与民间完善学科研究建制。
Abstract：Textbook, a special social language that is different from other types of text in the medium nature, features pluralism and nesting, era and nationality, duality and multi-modality. From the perspective of discipline paradigm, the medium of textbook can be regarded as the foundation of the construction of “textbook science”. From the perspective of the current development of the field of textbook research, textbook science has initially formed a discipline paradigm at both the conceptual and the social organizational level. However, this paradigm mainly exists in the related disciplines involving textbook research in a discrete form, which may be attributed to the fact that a considerable amount of research has not changed from “study by textbooks” to “study textbooks”. In the future, the construction of “textbook science” in China should consciously establish the research paradigm of “textbook science” with the action of textbook researchers, form the stable system of “textbook science” with the normalization of textbook research organization, build the action system of “textbook science” with the integration of textbook research and practice, and generate the disciplinary structure of “textbook science” with Chinese characteristics.
[1] 张文，李彦群.论“教科书学”的构建[J].当代教育科学，2018(11):11-16.
[2] 王攀峰，陈洋.教科书研究的内涵、价值与方法[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):167-174.
[3] Fuchs,E.Aktuelle Entwicklungen der schulbuchbezogenen Forschung in Europa[J].Bildung und Erziehung,2011(1):7–22.
[4] 石鸥，张学鹏.改革开放40年教科书建设再论[J].教育学报，2018(2):26-33.
[5] [6] [美] 托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].金吾伦，等，译.北京：北京大学出版社，2012:4,8.
[7] [美] 托马斯·库恩.必要的张力[M].范岱年，等，译.北京：北京大学出版社，2004:288.
[8] 杨斌.库恩“范式”的演变及其应用研究[D].天津：天津大学，2007:23.
[9] 舒志定.教育领导学学科建设范式论[J].教育科学研究，2010(11):12-16.
[10] [德] 马克思，恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第2卷)[M].中央编译局，编译.北京：人民出版社，1995:2.
[11] 高文.维果茨基心理发展理论与社会建构主义[J].外国教育资料，1999(4):10-14.
[12] Sawyer,J.E.& Stetsenko ,A.Revisiting Marx and Problematizing Vygotsky:A Transformative Approach to Language and Speech Internalization[J].Language Sciences,2018(6):143-154.
[13] 冯浩，何桂叶.儿童政治社会化：小学语文教材的视角[J].教育评论，2018(3):29-32.
[14][16][20][21] Fuchs,E.& Bock,A.The Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies[M].Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan,2018:16,174,414,413.
[15] Rezat,S.A Model of Textbook Use[A].Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education[C].Prague:Charles University in Prague,2006:409-416.
[17] Ball,D.L.& Cohen,D.K.Reform by the Book:What Is — Or Might Be — the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform?[J].Educational Researcher,1996(9):6-14.
[18] Rockinson-Szapkiw,A.J.,Courduff,J.,Carter,K.& Bennett,D.Electronic Versus Traditional Print Textbooks:A Comparison Study on the Influence of University Students' Learning[J].Computers & Education,2013(4):259-266.
[19] Friesen,N.The Past and Likely Future of an Educational Form:A Textbook Case[J].Educational Researcher,2013(9):498-508.
[22][26] Fuchs,E.Current Trends in History and Social Studies Textbook Research[J].Journal of International Cooperation in Education,2011(2):17-34.
[23] 刘艾清.课程与教学论范式研究综述[J].教育学术月刊，2016(5):107-111.
[24] Lambert,D.Textbook Pedagogy[A].Horsley,M.Perspectives on Textbooks[C].Sydney:TREAT,2002:34-45
[25] 王攀峰，宋雅琴.论教科书的内涵与属性[J].当代教育科学，2018(1):7-12.
[27] 余宏亮.通向根脉与面向未来：建构教材学的基础、逻辑与方略[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2021(2):30-39.
[28] 安桂清.教材使用的研究视角与基本逻辑[J].课程·教材·教法，2019(6):69-74.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G423.3
引用信息:
[1]李政.“教材学”的建构何以可能:基于教材媒介性的分析[J].全球教育展望,2022,51(01):65-75.
基金信息:
上海市教育委员会和上海市教育发展基金会“晨光计划”资助项目“职业教育与培训一体化的课程论基础研究”（项目编号：20CG33）的阶段性成果
2022-01-10
2022-01-10