nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 03, v.53 112-122
历史—社会—文化视域下的PISA科学素养
基金项目(Foundation): 全国教育科学“十三五”规划2020年度国家一般课题“高中学科核心素养的情境化测评框架研究”(项目编号:BHA200141)的阶段性研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2024-03-10
出版时间: 2024-03-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

在历史—社会—文化的视域下考察PISA科学素养的起源、内容和演变规律发现,社会现代化进程中产生的未来主义思想和标准化理念为PISA科学素养提供了文化土壤;OECD的科学教育宗旨和教育治理理念隐含的刚性框架制约了PISA科学素养的形式;其内容和演变过程受到科学素养专家组时任主席的研究偏好影响,不具备历史的归因逻辑。这使得PISA科学素养本质上是一种基础素养,不能彰显国际科学教育的发展趋势,是无法直接迁移的教育文化。在认识和理解PISA科学素养时,应该持审慎的态度,在本土的视野下进行深入探讨。

Abstract:

Examining the origin, content, and evolutionary patterns of PISA scientific literacy from the perspective of history, society, and culture reveals that the futuristic ideas and standardization concepts generated during the process of social modernization provide the cultural foundation for PISA scientific literacy. The rigid framework implied by the OECD's goals for science education and educational governance constrains the form of PISA scientific literacy. The content and evolutionary process of PISA scientific literacy are influenced by the research preferences of the chairperson of the scientific literacy expert group at the time, lacking a logical attribution to historical factors. As a result, this essentially renders PISA scientific literacy a foundational literacy that cannot fully showcase the developmental trends of international science education and is an educational culture that cannot be directly transferred. When recognizing and understanding PISA scientific literacy, one should adopt a cautious attitude and engage in in-depth discussions from a local perspective.

参考文献

[1][11] 刘磊明.国际学生评估项目(PISA)的“素养政治学”偏好[J].教育研究,2022(3):47-57.

[2][3] 王沪宁,美国反对美国[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1991:107-109,130 -131.

[4] OECD.Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills:A New Framework for Assessment[R].Paris:OECD Publishing,1999.

[5][6] United States Congress.National Defense Education Act,Report to Accompany H.R.13247[R].Washington,D.C.:Government Printing Office,1958.

[7] OECD.Polica Conference on Economic Growth and lt laestment in Education[R].Paris:OECD Publishing,1961.

[8] OECD.The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies:Executive Summary [EB/OL].http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf,1997-05-27/2022-11-05.

[9] 杜越.联合国教科文组织与全球教育治理[J].全球教育展望,2011(5):60-64.

[10] 张敏强.20 世纪教育测量学发展的回顾与现状评析[J].教育研究,1999(11):32-37.

[12] 魏冰.“科学素养”探析[J].比较教育研究,2000(S1):105-108.

[13][美]赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人:发达工业社会意识形态研究[M].刘继,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989.4-6.

[14] OECD.The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading,Mathematical and Scientific Literacy[R].Paris:OECD Publishing,2000:60.

[15] 刘磊明.“素养”的另一副面孔:以PISA为例[J].比较教育研究,2019(8):44-51.

[16] 黄颖,吴俊明.浅议PISA科学素养评估的发展变化[J].化学教学,2010(1):1-4.

[17] OECD.The PISA 2000 Technical Report[R].Paris:OECD Publishing,2001.

[18] [英]温·哈伦.科学教育的原则和大概念[M].韦钰,译.上海:科学普及出版社,2011:2.

[19] 冯翠典.PISA 2006 科学素养评估概念框架的分析及思考[J].外国中小学教育,2010(4):16-21.

[20] Bybee,R.W.Scientific Literacy,Environmental Issues,and PISA 2006:The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein Lecture[J].Journal of Science Education & Technology,2008(6):566-585.

[21] Bybee,R.W.Assessing Scientific Literacy in PISA 2006 and Fostering It in the United States.[J].国立教育政策研究所紀要,2008,137:117.

[22] OECD.The PISA 2015 Technical Report[R].Paris:OECD Publishing,2016.

[23] 刘帆,文雯.PISA 2015 科学素养测评框架新动向及其对我国科学教育的启示[J].外国教育研究,2015(10):117-128.

[24][26][27][29] OECD.PISA 2024 Strategic Vision and Direction for Science[EB/OL].https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA-2024-Science-Strategic-Vision-Proposal.pdf,2019-04-15/2023-08-16.

[25] Archer L,Osborne J,Dewitt J,et al.ASPIRES:Young People’s Science and Career Aspirations,Age 10-14[R].London:Kings College London,2013:119-132.

[28] Archer L,Osborne J,Dewitt J,et al.“Doing” Science Versus “Being” a Scientist:Examining10/11-Year-Old Schoolchildren’s Constructions of Science Through the Lens of Identity[J].Science Education,2010(4):617-639.

[30] 杨惠雯.核心素养的谱系学考察:基于OECD的分析与反思[J].比较教育研究,2019(2):53-59.

[31] Komatsu,K.& Rappleye,J.A New Global Policy Regime Founded on Invalid Statistics?Hanushek,Woessmann,PISA,and Economic Growth[J].Comparative Education,2017(2):166-191.

(1)1960年至今,国际上有关科学素养概念的探讨十分丰富。国内对科学素养演变的看法略有差异,这里以魏冰教授《“科学素养”探析》中所归纳的演变流程为依据。

基本信息:

中图分类号:G420

引用信息:

[1]张羽,王存宽.历史—社会—文化视域下的PISA科学素养[J].全球教育展望,2024,53(03):112-122.

基金信息:

全国教育科学“十三五”规划2020年度国家一般课题“高中学科核心素养的情境化测评框架研究”(项目编号:BHA200141)的阶段性研究成果

发布时间:

2024-03-10

出版时间:

2024-03-10

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索