| 1,563 | 5 | 329 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
科学写作既是一种元认知方式，又是一种论证学习模式，具有融合科学实践和科学思维的特征。作为表达科研成果的重要步骤和达成通识教育的重要环节，科学写作有利于促进科学实践、培养科学素养以及实现学评融合。在中小学科学教育中有效实施科学写作，可以通过引导学生在科学学习中加强写作能力训练，促进教师在科学教学中强化写作评价导向，鼓励学校在师生之间创设写作文化环境。
Abstract：Scientific writing is both a meta-cognitive approach and an argumentative mode of learning, characterized by the integration of scientific practice and scientific thinking. As an important step in presenting research results and an important component of achieving liberal arts education, scientific writing facilitates scientific practice, cultivating scientific literacy, and realizing the integration of learning and assessment. Effective implementation of scientific writing in primary and secondary science education can be achieved by guiding students to strengthen their writing skills in scientific learning, promoting teachers to emphasize their writing-oriented evaluation in science teaching, and encouraging schools to create a writing-centered cultural environment among teachers and students.
[1] 蔡铁权，陈丽华.科学教育中的科学写作[J].全球教育展望，2010(4):85-89.
[2] Benzon,W.L.& Hays,D.G.The Evolution of Cognition [J].Journal of Social and Biological Structures,1990(4):297-320.
[3] Graham,S.Handbook of Educational Psychology [M].Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,2006:457-478.
[4] Choi,A.,Hand,B.,& Greenbowe,T.Student’s Written Arguments in General Chemistry Laboratory Investigations [J].Research in Science Education,2013(43):1763-1783.
[5] Kingir,S.,Geban,O.,& Gunel,M.Using the Science Writing Heuristic Approach to Enhance Student Understanding in Chemical Change and Mixture [J].Research in Science Education,2013(43):1645-1663.
[6] Gere,A.R.,Limlamai,N.,Wilson,E.,et al.Writing and Conceptual Learning in Science:An Analysis of Assignments[J].Written Communication,2019(1):99-135.
[7] Key,C.M.The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills in Conjunction with Collaborative Writing Assignment:An Interpretive Study of Six Ninth-grade Students [J].Journal of Research in Science Education,1994(9):1003-1022.
[8] Shanahan,T.& Shanahan,C.Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents:Rethinking Content-area Literacy [J].Harvard Education Review,2008(78):40-59.
[9] Akerson,V.L.& Young,T.A.Science the “Write” Way [J].Science and Children,2005(3):38-41.
[10] National Academy of Science.A Framework for K-12 Science Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [S].Washington D.C.:National Academies Press,2013:75.
[11] Seung,E.,Park,S.,Kite,V.,et al.Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Understandings and Task Values of the Science Practices Advocated in the NGSS in the US [J].Education Sciences,2023(4):371.
[12] Tenopir,C.& King,D.W.Communication Patters of Engineers [M].New York,NY:Wiley,2014:89-92.
[13] 张一鸣，王健，白欣，等.美国NSTA科学教师培养标准变革及启示[J].课程·教材·教法，2021(12):130-136.
[14] 张一鸣，朱立祥.强调综合突出实践——《义务教育生物学课程标准(2022年版)》的要旨分析及教学建议[J].课程·教材·教法，2022(10):48-53.
[15] 大卫·安德森，季娇.从STEM教育到STEAM教育——大卫·安德森与季娇关于博物馆教育的对话[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2017(4):122-129.
[16] Rogers,A.Literacy in the Information Age:Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey [J].International Review of Education,2000(46):467-473.
[17] Klucevsek,K.M.& Brungard,A.B.Information Literacy in Science Writing:How Students Find,Identify,and Use Scientific Literature[J].International Journal of Science Education,2016(17):2573-2595.
[18] OECD.PISA 2025 Science Framework [EB/OL].https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/assets/docs/PISA_2025_Science_Framework.pdf,2023-05-10/2024-06-25.
[19] Mason,L.& Boscolo,P.Writing and Conceptual Change.What Changes?[J]Instructional Science,2000(3):199-226.
[20] Fellows,N.J.A Window into Thinking:Using Student Writing to Understand Conceptual Change in Science Learning [J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching,1994(31):985-1001.
[21] Hand,B.,Prain,V.,& Yore,L.D.Sequential Writing Tasks’ Influence on Science Learning [A].Tynj?l?,P.,Mason,L.,& Lonka,K.Writing as a Learning Tool:Integrating Theory and Practice[C].Dordrecht:Springer,2001:105-129.
[22] Jetton,T.L.& Shanahan,C.H.Adolescent Literacy in the Academic Disciplines:General Principles and Practical Strategies [M].New York,NY:The Guilford Press,2012:74-76.
[23] Harris,K.,Graham,S.,Brindle,M.,& Sandmel,K.Metacognition and Children’s Writing [A].Hacker,D.& Dunlosky,J.Handbook of Metacognition in Education [C].London and New York:Routledge,2009:131-153.
[24] Huerta,M.& Garza,T.Writing in Science:Why,How,and for Whom?A Systematic Literature Review of 20 Years of Intervention Research(1996-2016)[J].Educational Psychology Review,2019(31):533-570.
[25] Sedlacek,Q.C.& Lomelí,K.Towards Authentic Purposes for Student Science Writing Using Culturally Relevant Pedagogy [J].Cultural Studies of Science Education,2024(19):141-162.
[26] Miller,R.G.& Calfee,R.C.Making Thinking Visible:A Method to Encourage Science Writing in Upper Elementary Grades[J].Science and Children,2004(3):20-25.
[27] Reading Rockets.Classroom Strategy Library [EB/OL].https://www.readingrockets.org/classroom/classroom-strategies?focus=749&timing=All&purpose=All&size=All,2022-06-15/2024-03-20.
[28] Furtak,E.M.& Ruiz-Primo,M.A.Making Students’ Thinking Explicit in Writing and Discussion:An Analysis of Formative Assessment Prompts [J].Science Education,2008(5):798-824.
[29] MacArthur,C.Best Practices in Teaching Evaluation and Revision [A].Graham,S.,MacArthur,C.A.,& Fitzgerald,J.Best Practices in Writing Instruction [C].New York,NY:Guilford,2007:75-78.
[30] Chen,Y.C.,Hand,B.,& McDowell,L.E.A.H.The Effects of Writing-to-learn Activities on Elementary Students’ Conceptual Understanding:Learning about Force and Motion through Writing to Older Peers [J].Science Education,2013(5):745-771.
[31] Oliveira,A.W.Supporting Student Science Writing:Beyond Unreflective Macroscaffolds [J].Research in Science Education,2022(52):1207-1224.
[32] 李佩宁，高大伟.纸飞机——STEM课程之工程技术文档写作[J].基础教育参考，2017(16):29-32.
[33] Glen,N.J.& Dotger,S.Writing Like a Scientist:Exploring Elementary Teachers’ Understandings and Practices of Writing in Science[J].Journal of Science Teacher Education,2013(24):957-976.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G633.98
引用信息:
[1]张一鸣,余宏亮.科学写作：科学课程跨学科教学的新路径[J].全球教育展望,2025,54(01):136-148.
基金信息:
国家教材建设重点研究基地2023年度教育部规划项目“中小学科学教材中的跨学科案例中美比较研究”(项目编号：2023GH-YB-JJ-Y-10)的研究成果