| 1,388 | 11 | 256 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
校长轮岗与学校发展之间的关系，影响到校长轮岗政策的设计、实施和调整。本文对我国义务教育阶段790名校长进行问卷调查，考察校长轮岗对学校发展产生的影响。从校长的角度看，轮岗经历增强了校长在确定学校发展目标、培养教师、优化组织架构和教学发展等四个维度的领导力。从学校发展的角度看，轮岗校长对教师专业学习共同体、教师集体效能的促进作用的大小与非轮岗校长之间不存在显著差异。尽管轮岗校长通过教师专业学习共同体对教师对校长的信任度和教师工作满意度产生的间接促进作用大于非轮岗校长，但直接促进作用显著小于非轮岗校长，总体促进作用与非轮岗校长之间不存在显著差异。总体上看，校长轮岗对学校发展的效果尚未达到政策的预期目标。
Abstract：The relationship between principal rotation and school development has an influence on the design, implementation, and adjustment of the principal rotation policy. A survey exploring the effect of principal rotation on school development was conducted with 790 elementary and middle school principals in China. From principals' perspective, the leadership skills in terms of setting directions, cultivating teachers, restructuring the organization, and managing the instructional program were enhanced through rotation experience. From the perspective of school development, there was no significant difference between rotated and non-rotated principals on professional learning community and collective teacher efficacy. Although the indirect influencing effect of rotated principals on teachers' trust and job satisfaction through professional learning community was greater than that of non-rotating principals, the direct influencing effect of rotated principals was significantly less than that of non-rotating principals, and there was no significant difference between the two groups of principals in terms of the total influencing effect. Overall, the effect of principal rotation on school development has not achieved the anticipated goal of the policy.
[1] 中华人民共和国教育部，财政部，人力资源和社会保障部.关于推进县(区)域内义务教育学校校长教师交流轮岗的意见[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7151/201408/t20140815_174493.html,2014-08-15/2020-12-01.
[2][38][44] 陆露，于伟.校长交流轮岗的文化学审思[J].教育科学，2016(5):58-62.
[3][37] 叶菊艳，卢乃桂.“能量理论”视域下校长教师轮岗交流政策实施的思考[J].教育研究，2016(1):55-62.
[4][31][41] 郑智勇，肖林，王书林.回归内生动力：中小学校长交流轮岗的困境与思考[J].教育评论，2018(7):73-77.
[5] 司晓宏，杨令平.西部县域校长教师交流轮岗政策执行中的问题与对策[J].教育研究，2015(8):74-80.
[6] 夏智伦，刘奇军，汤毓婷.县域内义务教育学校校长教师轮岗交流对策研究——以湖南省义务教育学校为例[J].当代教育论坛，2015(3):1-10.
[7] 张清宇，苏君阳.校长教师交流轮岗实施方案中的问题与改进策略——基于35个区(县)校长教师交流轮岗实施方案的内容分析[J].教师教育研究，2017(6):59-65.
[8][33][36] 郑玉莲.轮岗后的校长继任与学校持续发展——十位“空降兵”校长的经验及启示[J].全球教育展望，2014(2):106-114.
[9] 郑玉莲，薛杉.轮岗政策背景下的校长任职管理：问题与可能出路[J].教育发展研究，2018(4):59-64.
[10][28] Hargreaves,A.,Moore,S.,Fink,D.,Brayman,C.& White,R.Succeeding Leaders?A Study of Principal Succession and Sustainability[R].Toronto:Ontario Principals Council,2003.
[11] MacMillan,R.B.The Relationship between School Culture and Principals' Practices at the Time of Succession[D].Toronto:University of Toronto,1996.
[12] Harris,A.Leadership Succession[J].School Leadership & Management:Formerly School Organization,2009(5):421-423.
[13] Stine,D.E.A Change of Administration:A Significant Organizational Life Event[C].San Diego:Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,1998.
[14][39] Fink,D.& Brayman,C.School Leadership Succession and the Challenge of Change[J].Educational Administration Quarterly,2006(1):62-89.
[15] Miskel,C.& Cosgrove,D.Leader Succession:A Model and Review for School Settings[C].New Orleans,LA:Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association ,1984.
[16][40] Macmillan,R.Leadership Succession,Cultures of Teaching and Educational Change[A].Hargreaves,A.& Bascia,N.(Eds.).The Sharp Edge of Educational Change[C].London:Falmer,2000:52-71.
[17][21] Meyer,M.J.& MacMillan,R.B.Principal Succession and the Micropolitics of Educators in Schools:Some Incidental Results from a Larger Study[J].Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy,2011(2):1-26.
[18] Uline,C.L.,Miller,D.M.& Tschannen-Moran,M.School Effectiveness:The Underlying Dimensions[J].Educational Administration Quarterly,1998(4):462-483.
[19] Rosenholtz,S.J.,Bassler,O.& Hoover-Dempsey,K.Organizational Conditions of Teacher Learning[J].Teaching and Teacher Education,1986(2):91-104.
[20] Olivier,D.F.& Hipp,K.K.Leadership Capacity and Collective Efficacy:Interacting to Sustain Student Learning in a Professional Learning Community[J].Journal of school leadership,2006(5):505-519.
[22] Day,C.,Sammons,P.,Leithwood,K.,Hopkins,D.,Gu,Q.,Brown,E.& Ahtaridou,E.School Leadership and Student Outcomes:Building and Sustaining Success[M].Maidenhead:Open University Press,2011.
[23] Leithwood,K.,Aitken,R.& Jantzi,D.Making School Smarter:Leading with Evidence (3rd ed.) [M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Corwin Press,2006.
[24] Schechter,C.& Tschannen-Moran,M.Teachers' Sense of Collective Efficacy:An International View[J].International Journal of Educational Management,2006(6):480-489.
[25] Louis,K.S.,Dretzke,B.& Wahlstrom,K.How Does Leadership Affect Student Achievement?Results from a National US Survey[J].School Effectiveness and School Improvement,2010(3):315-336.
[26] Ostroff,C.The Relationship between Satisfaction,Attitudes,and Performance:An Organizational Level Analysis[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1992(6):963-964.
[27] 郑玉莲.校长继任的现实意义及可能的问题规避[J].教育发展研究，2014(10):35-38.
[29] Rebhun,G.If It's Tuesday,It Must Be P.S.101[J].Executive Educator,1995(5):21-23.
[30] 张佳，傅锐杰，邵兴江.轮岗对校长领导力提升存在“黄金频次”效应——基于对校长多维领导力发展的实证调查[J].基础教育，2021(5):39-50.
[32] 刘园园.中小学校长轮岗制存在的问题及其规避[J].教学与管理，2015(7):8-10.
[34] 郑玉莲.我国中小学校长轮岗现状及其改进路径：县域系统领导力的视角[J].全球教育展望，2020(7):46-61.
[35] 熊知深，袁红兵.校长轮岗制下学校组织政治的博弈分析[J].中小学管理，2008(5):21-23.
[42] 张蕊.漫议校长轮岗交流制[J].江苏教育，2013(11):50-51.
[43] 吴志伟.轮岗交流制下难出“教育家”[J].江苏教育，2013(11):51-52.
(1)在进行多群组结构方程模型分析时,首先将校长分为非轮岗校长和轮岗校长两组,分别对两组校长的领导力对教师专业学习共同体的影响进行结构方程模型分析,再对两个模型进行差异检验,即检验两个模型中校长领导力对教师专业学习共同体影响的路径系数大小是否存在显著性差异。其次,将轮岗校长分为轮岗1次、轮岗2次和轮岗3次及以上三组,进行上述多群组结构方程模型分析。表4到表6的多群组结构方程模型分析均按照上述步骤进行。
基本信息:
中图分类号:G522.3
引用信息:
[1]张佳,顾建民.校长轮岗对义务教育学校发展有影响吗?[J].全球教育展望,2022,51(02):77-92.
基金信息:
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“乡村教育振兴背景下浙江省校长交流轮岗政策绩效评估研究”(项目编号：19NDJC175YB); 教育部人文社会科学青年项目“乡村教育振兴背景下教师交流轮岗政策绩效的实证研究”(项目编号：19YJC880131)的研究成果
2020-08-23
2020
2021-04-14
2021-05-13
2021
1
2022-02-10
2022-02-10