| 1,378 | 22 | 261 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
同伴互助学习因其突出了知识的社会性建构而更有助于学生实现知识创生，其中，话语是知识创生的关键要素之一。学生在同伴互助学习中可以通过话语分配权力、发展身份，并通过规则均衡权力、减少偏见。话语作为知识创生的起点，同时也是影响同伴互助学习中知识创生的外在表现，其言外之力、内容和话轮是帮助学生形成权衡能力、树立权威认同、建立权责观念的重要因素。基于对话语和同伴互助学习中知识创生关系的论证，在实际课堂实践中，可以通过发扬互助精神，减少压迫性的言外之力，从而创造良好的互助环境；通过即时分析学生的话语内容，优化互助小组的配制；通过制定规则，均衡分配学生的话轮，以此提升同伴互助的效率与效果。
Abstract：Because of its emphasis on social construction of knowledge, Peer Assisted Learning(PAL) helps students in understanding and creating new knowledge, among which discourse is one of the key elements of knowledge creation. Discourse is an essential medium for student learning. Students can distribute power through discourse, develop identity, balance power through rules, and reduce prejudice through PAL activities. As the starting point for knowledge creation, discourse is also an external performance that influences knowledge creation in PAL, and its illocutionary force, content and turn are important factors that help students form the ability to weigh, establish the identity of authority and establish the awareness of power and responsibility. Based on the demonstration of the relationship between discourse and peer mutual aid learning, we can develop the spirit of mutual aid to reduce the oppressive illocutionary force and create a positive mutual aid environment in classroom practices, optimize the formulation of mutual aid groups by analyzing students' discourse content in real time and formulate rules to balance students' discourse turns in cooperation, which can improve the efficiency and effect of PAL.
[1] 张玉彬.合作学习的理论与实践[M].北京：光明日报出版社，2017:2-3.
[2] 高文，徐斌艳，吴刚.建构主义教育研究[M].北京：教育科学出版社，2008:5-11.
[3] Topping,K.J.Trends in Peer Learning [J].Educational Psychology,2005(6):631-645.
[4] 郑葳，李芒.学习共同体及其生成[J].全球教育展望，2007(4):57-62.
[5] 蒋波，谭顶良.论有效合作学习的内在机制[J].中国教育学刊，2011(6):33-36.
[6] 马兰，盛群力.究竟是什么促成了合作——合作学习基本要素之比较[J].教育发展研究，2008(18):29-34.
[7] 常亚慧，万晓霞.契约与私交：合作学习的关系逻辑[J].全球教育展望，2021(6):67-77.
[8] 王鉴.合作学习的形式、实质与问题反思——关于合作学习的课堂志研究[J].课程·教材·教法，2004(8):30-36.
[9] 杨二兵.学生合作学习中存在的问题及改进对策[J].教育理论与实践，2012(20):63-64.
[10] 王永进.话语理论与实践[M].上海：上海交通大学出版社，2018:2-3.
[11] Foucault,M.The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language[M].New York,NY:Pantheon.1972:215-237.
[12] Díez-Palomar,J.,Chan,M.C.E.,Clarke,D.,et al.How Does Dialogical Talk Promote Student Learning during Small Group Work?An Exploratory Study [J].Learning,Culture and Social Interaction,2021(3):Article 100540.
[13] Asterhan,C.S.C.& Babichenko,M.The Social Dimension of Learning through Argumentation:Effects of Human Presence and Discourse Style [J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2015(3):740-755.
[14] Carnevale,P.J.& Probst,T.M.Social Values and Social Conflict in Creative Problem Solving and Categorization [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998(5):1300-1309.
[15] Mead,G.H.Mind,Self and Society:From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist [M].Chicago,IL:University of Chicago Press,1934:3728-3732.
[16] Davies,J.Expressions of Gender:An Analysis of Pupils’ Gendered Discourse Styles in Small Group Classroom Discussions [J].Discourse & Society,2003(2):115-132.
[17] Gumperz,J.J.Sociolinguistics and Communication in Small Groups [A].Pride,J.B.& Holmes,J.(Eds.).Sociolinguistics:Selected Readings [C].Harmondsworth:Penguin,1970:203-224.
[18] Carter,J.D.,Hall,J.A.,Carney,D.R.,et al.Individual Differences in the Acceptance of Stereotyping [J].Journal of Research in Personality,2006(6):1103-1118.
[19] Bernier,A.& Stenstrom,C.Moving from Chance and “Chemistry” to Skills:Improving Online Student Learning Outcomes in Small Group Collaboration [J].Education for Information,2016(1):55-69.
[20] Amrhein,P.C.The Comprehension of Quasi-performative Verbs in Verbal Commitments:New Evidence for Componential Theories of Lexical Meaning [J].Journal of Memory and Language,1992(6):756-784.
[21] Uleman,J.S.Consciousness and Control:The Case of Spontaneous Trait Inferences [J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1987(3):337-354.
[22] Herman,V.Dramatic Discourse:Dialogue as Interaction in Plays [M].New York,NY:Routledge,1995:85-92.
[23] Mullen,B.& Copper,C.The Relation between Group Cohesiveness and Performance:Integration [J].Psychological Bulletin,1994(2):210-227.
[24] 刘虹.会话结构分析[M].北京：北京大学出版社，2004:66-67.
[25] Tolbert,S.,Gray,S.,Rivera,M.,et al.Teaching Science to Transgress:Portraits of Feminist Praxis [J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2022(1):127-165.
[26] Lou,Y.,Abrami,P.C.,Spence,J.C.,et al.Within-class Grouping:A Meta-analysis [J].Review of Educational Research,1996(4):423-458.
[27] Webb,N.& Palincsar,A.Group Processes in the Classroom [A].Berliner,D.C.& Calfee,R.C.(Eds.).Handbook of Educational Psychology [C].New York,NY:MacMillan,1996:841-873.
[28] Murphy,P.K.,Greene,J.A.,Firetto,C.M.,et al.Exploring the Influence of Homogeneous versus Heterogeneous Grouping on Students’ Text-based Discussions and Comprehension [J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,2017(4):336-355.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G424
引用信息:
[1]邓阳,何雨婷.同伴互助学习中话语创生知识的内在机制、外在表现与实现策略[J].全球教育展望,2022,51(08):28-38.
基金信息:
华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目“教师教育专项”团队项目(项目编号：CCNUTEII2021-04)的阶段性研究成果
2022-08-10
2022-08-10