| 539 | 0 | 595 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
基于核心素养培育的思政课程改革虽已在理念层面深入人心,却难以有效渗透并改变思政课堂教学现状。为切实缓和素养培育与知识教学的矛盾,教科书理应从“教学材料”的属性中剥离出来,朝着课程文本和学生用书的方向发展,改变思政教师“教教材”和“用教材教”的观念,帮助学生构建自适应学习场域。当前思政教材设计对自适应学习重视不足,统编教材栏目使用效果不佳。思政教材亟待从关注“教”向关注“学”转型,让思政教材成为学生学习的第一任“教师”,让教师成为学生经历学习过程、习得关键能力的协助者。除我国思政教材外,本研究剖析了法国和日本教材,发现前者以问题引发认知冲突提升可读性,后者以搭建学习支架增强可理解性,这为我国思政教材场域构建提供了启示,有助于将教师从知识教学的课堂中解放出来,使其深度投入教材开发,关注培养学生学会学习的能力,进而为促进学生核心素养的真实培育提供有效启示。
Abstract:The reform of ideological and political(IP) education courses aimed at fostering core competencies has been widely accepted in theory but has struggled to effectively transform classroom teaching practices. To genuinely resolve the contradiction between competency cultivation and knowledge-based teaching, textbooks should shift from merely “teaching materials” to course texts and student-centered learning resources. This transformation can help IP teachers move away from merely “teaching the textbook” or “using the textbook to teach, ” and instead support students in constructing adaptive learning environments. Currently, IP textbooks do not sufficiently emphasize adaptive learning, and the use of unified compilation textbook sections is ineffective. IP textbooks urgently need to shift from focusing on teaching to focusing on learning, making textbooks as a first teacher of students, while positioning teachers as facilitators who guide students through the learning process and help them acquire key competencies. Beyond analyzing IP textbooks in China, this study also examines textbooks from France and Japan. It finds that French textbooks enhance readability by using questions to provoke cognitive conflicts, while Japanese textbooks improve comprehensibility by building learning scaffolds. These insights offer valuable lessons for constructing learning environments in Chinese IP textbooks, helping to free teachers from knowledge-centered classrooms andorient them to deeply engaging curriculum development, focusing on fostering students' ability to learn effectively, and ultimately promoting the authentic cultivation of students' core competencies.
[1] 段玉山,丁荣,杨昕.让学生成为认知主体:学法指导功能教材编写框架与实践[J].全球教育展望,2024(6):16-27.
[2] 朱新明,李亦菲,朱丹.人的自适应学习——示例学习的理论与实践[M].北京:中央广播电视大学出版社,1997:168-191.
[3] 蔡荣华,陈链.国内外主流自适应学习系统对比研究[J].数字教育,2021(2):22-26.
[4] 张茜茜,李顺祥,杨莉.高校创新型人才个性化培养的路径研究——基于自适应理论学习[J].科技风,2022(15):144-146.
[5] 贺诚,李臣之.学生眼中的好教材:特征、意蕴与启示[J].全球教育展望,2024(6):28-41.
[6] 沈晓敏,石雨晨,程力,等.德育学科如何开发有教育价值的单元教学材料——以电影《我不是药神》为例[J].全球教育展望,2024(1):40-51.
[7] 韩震.新编普通高中思想政治教材的理念与特点[J].课程·教材·教法,2020(1):31-38.
[8] 柳叶青.活动理论视角下教材评价标准构建研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2017.
[9][13][22] [日]有田和正.我的教材研究[A].[日]市川博.社会科的使命与魅力——日本社会科教育文选[C].沈晓敏,主译.北京:教育科学出版社,2006:159,159,159.
[10][14] 李冉,刘佳.凝聚“教材强国”建设的强大合力:新时代教材建设体制机制的历程、结构与展望[J].课程·教材·教法,2020(4):53-59.
[11] 王丹艺.知识转型下的教科书嬗变[J].全球教育展望,2021(8):76-92.
[12] 张倩,黄毅英.教科书研究之方法论建构[J].课程·教材·教法,2016(8):41-47.
[15] 中华人民共和国教育部.普通高中教科书思想政治选择性必修1:当代国际政治与经济[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2019:2-13.
[16][17][18][19][20] [法]侯贝,波瓦攸,马崒威,等.法国高中生哲学读本Ⅰ:政府是人民的主人还是仆人?——探讨政治的哲学之路[M].廖健苡,译.沈清楷,审定.新北市:大家出版,2016:5,18,105,107,116.
[21] [古希腊]亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M].廖申白,译注.北京:商务印书馆,2003:145-146.
[23][24] 日本文部科学省.高等学校公民科用文部科学省検定済教科書:公共[M].東京:東京書籍株式会社,2021:84-85,62-63.
[25] Young,M.Researching the Curriculum:From Knowledge of the Powerful to Powerful Knowledge[A].The 13th Shanghai International Curriculum Forum[C].Shanghai:East China Normal University Press,2015.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G41
引用信息:
[1]文雯,沈晓敏.引发自适应学习的思政教材场域构建——基于中法日同类教材编写逻辑的比较[J].全球教育展望,2025,54(05):57-69.
基金信息:
2024年国家社会科学基金重点项目“推进大中小学思想政治教育一体化建设的实践探索研究”(项目编号:24AKS025)的阶段性成果
2025-05-15
2025-05-15