| 1,549 | 0 | 153 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
STEM(科学、技术、工程、数学)教育作为一种创新的教育理念,在全球范围内备受关注。STEM教育本土化建构成为当下我国应对国际挑战,推进教育强国建设的内在要求。本文围绕STEM教育本土化过程中理念认知、概念创新、实践样态、政策研制、制约因素等核心问题,对包括一线教师、教育管理者、教育研究者、企业人员在内的4381人进行问卷调查,研究发现:STEM教育理念已得到广泛认同,但其本质内涵应进一步丰富和转化;专家群体整体上不赞同“创新STEM概念”,一线教师的态度则更开放;我国对STEM教育具体实践关注不足,实施水平有待提升;被调查者整体赞同在小学单独开STEM课程,不赞同在初高中单独开课;师资、教材与设备以及学校课程规划成为制约STEM教育发展的重要问题。推进STEM教育本土化的关键在于把握STEM教育核心价值导向,挖掘新课程既有概念的生长点,探索STEM教育的多种实践样态,充分释放STEM育人活力。
Abstract:As an innovative educational concept, STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) education has received significant global attention. The localization of STEM education has become an intrinsic requirement for China to respond to international challenges and advance the development of building China into a leading country in education. This paper investigates core issues in the localization process of STEM education, including conceptual understanding, conceptual innovation, practice patterns, policy development, and constraining factors, based on a questionnaire survey of 4381 participants, such as front-line teachers, education administrators, education researchers, and enterprise personnel. The study found that while the concept of STEM education is widely recognized, its core meaning requires further enrichment and adaptation; experts generally disapprove of “innovating STEM concepts”, whereas front-line teachers hold a more open attitude; insufficient attention has been paid to the concrete practices of STEM education in China, and the implementation level needs to be improved; respondents generally agreed to offer STEM as a separate subject in primary schools, but not in junior or senior high schools; issues such as teachers, teaching materials, and equipment as well as school curriculum planning have become significant constraints on the development of STEM education. The key to promoting the localization of STEM education lies in grasping its core value orientation, identifying starting points within the existing new curricula, exploring various practical forms, and thereby fully unleashing the vitality of STEM education in nurturing students.
[1] 李雁冰.“科学、技术、工程与数学”教育运动的本质反思与实践问题——对话加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学Nashon教授[J].全球教育展望,2014(11):3-8.
[2] 赵中建,龙玫.美国STEM学习生态系统的构建[J].教育发展研究,2015(5):61-66.
[3] 赵中建.美国中小学工程教育及技术与工程素养评估[J].全球教育展望,2016(12):3-24.
[4] 许海莹,范国睿.美国STEM教育监测述评[J].外国中小学教育,2015(11):5-15.
[5] 杨明全.论STEM教育的本土化建构:内涵,价值及实践探索[J].现代远程教育研究,2024(1):39-45.
[6] 范文翔,张一春.STEAM教育:发展、内涵与可能路径[J].现代教育技术,2018(3):99-105.
[7] 余胜泉,胡翔.STEM教育理念与跨学科整合模式[J].开放教育研究,2015(4):13-22.
[8] 詹泽慧,钟柏昌,霍丽名,等.面向文化传承的学科融合教育(C-STEAM):价值定位与分类框架[J].中国电化教育,2020(3):69-76.
[9] 胡卫平,首新,陈勇刚.中小学STEAM教育体系的建构与实践[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2017(4):31-39.
[10] 王佑镁,郭静.设计思维:促进STEM教育与创客教育的深度融合[J].电化教育研究,2019(3):34-41.
[11][15] 袁磊,郑开玲,张志.STEAM教育:问题与思考[J].开放教育研究,2020(3):51-57.
[12] 曹培杰.STEM教育的关键:跨学科、灵活课时与深度学习[J].中小学管理,2018(10):31-33.
[13] 任平,贺阳.超越STEM:德国MINT教育课程体系建设的主要特征与时代启示[J].全球教育展望,2024(10):3-19.
[14] 吴易林,余秀兰,倪颖,等.“3+1+2”新高考选科行为的分化及其功利化释疑[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2024(3):76-82.
[16] 康云菲.全球图景与中国路向STEM教育研究的知识图谱分析[J].电化教育研究,2025(4):114-121.
[17] 杨明全.论STEM教育的本土化建构:内涵、价值及实践探索[J].现代远程教育研究,2024(1):39-45.
[18] 曹建.国际STEM教育研究所落户上海,助力提升科技创新人才培养质量[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2023/55669/mtbd/202312/t20231221_1095618.html,2023-12-21/2025-04-16.
[19] 代蕊华,高辛宇.“国优计划”何以培优?——基于“国优生”培养体系构建的实践审思[J].教师发展研究,2024(4):69-74.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G434
引用信息:
[1]刘登珲,任平.STEM教育本土化建构调查报告[J].全球教育展望,2025,54(11):55-66.
基金信息:
国家教材建设重点研究基地2025年度教育部规划重大项目“中小学STEM教育本土概念建构研究”的阶段性成果