| 781 | 32 | 92 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文从有效教学研究的片面化倾向分析入手,探讨了教学的有效性与道德性可能存在的悖论,进而通过引入儒学的"以善致善"命题探讨了教学中目的与手段一致性的教育学意义,并将其作为理解教学道德性内涵的重要视角。而真正教学道德性的彰显亦即德性教学的实现,不妨从认清理论立场并克服认识障碍,从科学认知走向"体知",以及体现教师责任的教学方式转变等几方面展开努力。
Abstract：In this article it discusses the possible paradox between effectiveness and virtue of teaching,which is based on the unilateral trend in research on effective teaching.And then it analyses the pedagogical meaning in the coherence between ends and means on the reference of "YiShanZhiShan"(the pursuit of virtue by moral means),a proposition which is from Confucianism and as important perspective on understanding the essence of virtue of teaching.The real representation of virtue of teachig may as well be achieved by the following ways such as the clearness of theoretical standpoint and overcome of cognitive misinterpretation,the diversion from scientific cognition to "TiZhi"(lived experience),and the transformation of ways of teaching which is manifestation of teachers' teaching responsibility.
[1]刘万海.德性教学论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2009.
[2]李首民.从伦理的角度看教育手段[J].学生之友,2010(2):27.
[3]张华.学习哲学论[J].全球教育展望,2010(6):13.
[4]张华.研究性教学论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010:123-124.
[5][15][22]【美】米尔斯.社会学的想象力[M].陈强等译.北京:三联书店出版社,2001:182-183,82,86.
[6]赵汀阳.教育为了什么[J].北京教育(普教),2009(2):1.
[7]蒋庆,盛洪.以善致善[M].上海:三联书店,2003.
[8]论语.卫灵公.
[9]陈嘉映.以恶致善还是以善致善-[J].读书,2004(6):45.
[10]王小东.走在中国主流思想界的前面——回顾与展望当代中国民族主义[J].中国与世界观察,2005(1):19.
[11]蒋庆.儒学的真精神与真价值[J].理论参考,2007(7):22.
[12]【美】杜威.民主主义与教育[M].王承绪译.北京:人民教育出版社,1990:112.
[13][14]梁漱溟等.梁漱溟先生论儒佛道[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004:73,74.
[16]正蒙.大心篇.
[17]周炽成.德性之知与见闻之知:从宋明儒家到现代新儒家[J].学术研究,1994(2):48.
[18]顾红亮.对德性之知的再阐释[J].孔子研究,2005(5).
[19]杜维明.杜维明文集(第五卷)[M].武汉:武汉出版社,2002:352.
[20][21]Oser,F.K.,Dick,A.&Patry,J.(Eds.),Effective and responsible teaching:The newsynthesis,San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.1992:441,445.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G424
引用信息:
[1]刘万海.以善致善:教学道德性论题的儒学启示[J].全球教育展望,2011,40(03):17-22.
基金信息:
2009教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“新课程下德性教学的理论深化与创新机制研究”资助(立项号:09YJC880048)
2011-03-15
2011-03-15